The impact of social media networking sites
Social media networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on individual people as well as society and local communities. In my opinion, I agree that social media networking sites have a damaging effect. However, I also believe that, such sites are mainly give beneficial to individual.
With regard to society and local communities, the impact of social media networking sites can only be seen as negative. People more interest in someone online rather than the real people around them. Consequently, they are closer to people who have never been known before than their real friend or family. Furthermore, this kind of social interaction can result in poor family relationship and friendship.
On the other hand, the such social media networking sites also have had clear advantages for individual person. Firstly, it is easy to meet both new friends and old friends. Not a few of them can build a good relationship from social networking. Secondly, many people use social media sites to get knowledge that they need. To give a clear example, they who need to improve their English, they can get online course from a Facebook and can interact with a native speaker by a Facebook or other social media websites.
In conclusion, although social media networking sites can decrease intensity and quality of family relationship and friendship, for some people individually, they can help them to build a good relationship and also to get knowledge. So, people should use social media networking sites wisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-18 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | Tung Linh | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | buahkiwienak | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...lso believe that, such sites are mainly give beneficial to individual. With reg...
^^^^
Line 13, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e social media networking sites wisely.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19291338583 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77851245098 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531496062992 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3599290009 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455110029371 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186980851436 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159862919618 0.0667982634062 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312421075011 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479618202295 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.