Eating fastfood
The bar chart provides information regarding the extent of eating fastfood in US by a period of 10 years.
It is obvious that there was a downward tendency in this period. However, the number of people who went to fastfood restaurant in 2006 had a slightly increase.
To be specific, the downward trend was shown clearly by the evidence that the number of people who went to fastfood restaurants everyday had a fall, which was about 4% in 2003 and under 3% in 2006, then remained in 2013. However, the figures for individuals ate this kind of food several times a week and once a week jumped to about 20% and 33% in 2006 before reached the bottom in 2013, at nearly 15% and 27% respectively.
In addtion, there was an impressive number of people who just ate fastfood once or twice a month, which peaked at around 33% in 2013. Then, the number of citizens ate this a few times a year maitainted at 15% while it of people who never took this was about 4% in 2006 and 2013.
- Some people claim that not enough the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste. 61
- Many people work at home using modern technology today Some people think only workers benefit from this not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- greenhouse 11
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip and the plan for its development.Summarise the information about the main features. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...went to fastfood restaurant in 2006 had a slightly increase. To be specific, the downward trend wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...people who went to fastfood restaurants everyday had a fall, which was about 4% in 2003 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39779005525 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43293489153 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.616828223 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1555288517 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864300265538 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100870199572 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128070978557 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102988796837 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.