The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What is the cause of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The deterioration of the environment is alarming in recent years. It is argued that the phenomenon could be attibutable to the expansion of consumer sector. The cause and splution for the issue will be elaborated below.
The main reason behind the argument stems from thr fact that chemicals use to produce shampoo, toothpaste and so forth produce a large amount of toxic waste. The wasted by-products would take years to be naturally processed. More importantly, the packaging of daily used products are mostly made from plastic, which leaves a large amount of carbon footprint on the wild. This is the main culprit of environmental contamination. Finally, the short cycle of these goods and overexploitation of advertising in selling these products, make them constantly demanded by the market and exacerbate the impact on the environment.
To cope with the increasing number of waste from the consumer industry, the intervention of government is of great importance. First, customers should be educated about the impact of the sector on the nature through videos, pictures, and social programs. By doing so, the government may discourage uses of products that could have negative impacts on the wild and motivate people to buy the ones having less effects on the planet. Another viable alternative is restrictions on manufacturers of the consumer goods. This would come under forms legislation on limitation of plastic use, standardized production procedure in order to reduce the amount hazardous components to the ecosystem. Likewise, the authorities should give rewards for firms that promote the use of eco-friendly ingredients. For instance, tax cut, subsidies and favorable policies should be granted for the companies. These strategies may not be able reverse the process of global warming or other upcoming disaster, but would slow down the progression.
In sum, waste from manufacturing and consuming of the consumer products are the main precursor of environmental destruction. Governmental parties could solve the issue by education for the public, and lawful interference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Young people learn good behavior more from movies and books than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Internet social media have become very popular To what extent do you think this is a good or bad thing Why do you think this is the case 79
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ment stems from thr fact that chemicals use to produce shampoo, toothpaste and so f...
^^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... produce a large amount of toxic waste. The wasted by-products would take years to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun effects is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... motivate people to buy the ones having less effects on the planet. Another viable a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, likewise, may, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4537037037 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1009949065 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8809246471 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178550645509 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544500884869 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364876083763 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108144371896 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135948274042 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.