Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, the traffic congestion and environment pollution is elevating exponentially worldwide, which have also become a controversial issue globally. It is considered that increasing the cost of fossil fuel such as petrol is the most suitable method for mitigating the issues of increasing traffic and pollution. I strongly believe that although, higher price of petrol can reduce traffic as well as pollution significantly, but there are also some other measures, which can be effective to resolve these issues. This essay will discuss the actions or measures to solve critical problem of traffic congestion and pollution.
To begin with, even though expensive price of petrol will minimize the traffic and pollution, there are several measures to reduce these existing problems. One of the obvious measures can be removing the out- dated vehicles, which played the vital role in pollution by emitting harmful gases like carbon-dioxide. Likewise, throwing them out will obviously decrease vehicles on the roads also. Similarly, use of more public transportation rather than owing private vehicles will definitely reduce the pollution to some extent.
Moreover, encouraging people to use alternative sources of energy such as solar and electric instead of fossil like petrol sharply drop the air pollution. Furthermore, constructing the wider and broad roads, which considerably minimize the traffic during rush hours. In addition, development of other modes of transportation such railways and shuttle trains gradually decrease the traffic congestion in big and busy cities.
The survey conducted in Nepal has already announced that developing railways in different of country will consequently limit the traffic and pollution problems especially in the cities like Kathmandu, Pokhara and Butwal.
To conclude, the government of all countries should take initiation to reduce the pollution, which have become the most critical issue these days. From my point of view, concerned authorities should take action against increasing traffic jams and the consequences created by them. I suggest the government to conduct awareness programs about the pollution and threat created by it.
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 75
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 38
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...bviously decrease vehicles on the roads also. Similarly, use of more public transpor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71036585366 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92553166103 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9827894193 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.866666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160335466649 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053651239944 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414260679953 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821001972437 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512556016055 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.