Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or diagree What other measures do you think might be effective

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or diagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Some people believe that increasing the price of gasoline can be an effective way to reduce traffic and pollution problems. I completely disagree with this idea. There are some reasons and examples.32 word

First of all, gasoline is essential for cars to move. Many people use their private cars for going to work, and if the government increases the price of gasoline, it may be hard for them to pay for it, so they must use public transportation, which is sometimes not possible for them. For example, if their office is far from the bus stop and I think it causes dissatisfaction and problems, some people may think about changing their work and choosing an office near their house, and that would be a problem for companies.94 word

To solve traffic problems I think the government must try to reduce the price of tickets for public transportation so all people can use it, especially the poor people in society, or build new bus or subway stations in all parts of each province. For air pollution, I think with the help of artificial intelligence we can sufficiently reduce it, for example, with the use of artificial rain or renewable resources.

To sum up, I think we must choose better solutions with the help of new technologies and also use the experience of development countries, for example, Japan, because they have good knowledge of dealing with these kinds of problems..

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-28 monaiiii 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... To sum up, I think we must choose better solutions with the help of new technolo...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 232, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... of dealing with these kinds of problems..
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, for example, i think, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89915966387 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83278046311 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550420168067 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.892741518 49.4020404114 279% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.571428571 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995691052988 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531332813006 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678533924891 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708659815611 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451707286258 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.