Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference

Essay topics:

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.

Nowadays, environmental problems have been a trending topic. Ordinary people are said to have no impacts on environmental improvements, while huge organizations and authorities can make several differences, which I do not support thanks to several reasons.
Firstly, it is no doubt that governments and big companies have more enormous impacts on the environment. An ordinary citizen, however, can offer a means of environment protection by raising the public's awareness. In other words, every each need to understand the potential risks they might face if he or she keeps destroying their habitats. For example, leaflets, brochures, or billboards about environmental issues should be sent to every household family to understand its importance. As a result, the chance of better their surrounding environment might increase.
Secondly, I am of the opinion that people can do something to better the environment by recycling. It means the public should make attempts to reuse everything from an item they bought, namely wrapping papers, boxes, and bags. Such attempts could be considered the epitome of people's environmental protection efforts. According to some reports conducted in Vietnam, millions of garbage were released into the environment last year. Had those things been reused for different purposes, the significant changes would have made for our environment. Thus, the environment could be improved in some ways.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that people, not only governments or big corporations, can make differences to help the environment in many ways, such as raising awareness about the environment and recycling household waste.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-28 MinyiChu 78 view
2023-08-12 Đỗ Anh Tuấn 56 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 56 view
2023-05-31 Guiseppe59192 67 view
2023-05-26 Detonate 11 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...f environment protection by raising the publics awareness. In other words, every each n...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59760956175 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1631509167 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2546085149 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252442997896 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771778331149 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815967461639 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159086527711 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734395752155 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.