Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past few years the topic of saving the environment has become significantly important. There is a heated debate between groups of individuals that caring about environment can't be done at individual level and can only be done by authorities or large companies. This essay will discuss both the ideologies.
Due to the rapid growing industries and advancement in technology people are becoming more and more reliable on them without thinking about the negative ramification on the nature. There are many summits happening at the global level to make world aware about the adverse effect of recent development on mother nature. It is a general trivia that thinking about saving earth can only be done at bigger level which includes different ministries and big corporations. To some extent the magnitude of steps taken at large level is comparatively significant in benefits than those taken at individual level. There are many examples of such initiatives, for instance industries dealing with chemicals can treat their water before sending it in outer waterbodies. This could drastically decrease harmful toxicant from appearing in natural water. Government can also step in to encourage such initiatives by providing incentives for businesses for thinking towards betterment of earth.
Other aspect to this discussion is environment cannot be saved only by people in power but also at individual level. There are may things that public can incorporate in their daily life which will help towards a better future of earth. One of the many things that can be done is households can segregate their wastes into different categories before throwing it out for garbage trucks to pick them up. Other is everyone should minimize the use of plastic at daily basis in order reduce the amount of plastic in the surrounding. There are many other things that can be done at small level which would amplify eventually and have a larger impact towards saving our planet.
Hence, we can conclude after discussing the above points that saving planet or environment is not only a responsibility of government or corporations but also of individual member of every state and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dividuals that caring about environment cant be done at individual level and can onl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20738636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81757319079 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553977272727 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4142205928 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6875 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194421760388 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063742701238 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532373842472 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13760263398 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177189596371 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.