Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
It is thought by the people that a single person cannot protect the environment and they believe that the government and other big companies can provide solutions by investing money. In this essay, I disagree with the idea that the government are solely responsible for improving the environment.
On the one hand, people used to think that government has to take care of the environment by being affected. Government can make strict rules and the people responsible to follow the rules like do not use plastic but is not widely accepted in most of the places. Despite government creating rules in order to protect natural habitat but he people have to aware of those rules. However, the government is not only the sole responsibility for protecting the environment and people should join hand and help them in order to protect the environment. For example, there are so many organisation are creating just for saving the natural habitat and they are organising a function to aware the people about climate changes.
On the other hand, rules need to make not to cut down trees in forest as well as in cities and the government need to create a rule for the industries, waste material not to dump in rivers and they have to recycled proper and one more for industries is that amount of CO2 are releasing to atmosphere that one needs to filter in underground. The mentioned above things if not take in place then the government has to punish them like ban the industries. The big companies need to provide money and their employees for spreading awareness to the people. For instance, TATA company has joined hand in "Make in India" and "SWATCH BHARATH".
In conclusion, people need to join hand with the government then only our environment will be in safer side otherwise for the future generation they might not see the world at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China 87
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...order to protect natural habitat but he people have to aware of those rules. However, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organisation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organisations'.
Suggestion: many organisations
... environment. For example, there are so many organisation are creating just for saving the natura...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89905362776 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77216536933 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501577287066 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.288844721 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171148825354 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695538368985 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05346592199 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114119721751 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060494698621 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.