The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The consumption of fossil fuel is a global concern for the reason that it has negative effects on the environment. It is axiomatic that every nation must work together immediately to reduce its usage. I believe that the international community should reinforce this in order to reach the best results.
Undoubtedly, the use of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil have been long damaging the world's natural resources. This phenomenon is a worldwide concern since the effect is not confined to a local area alone. For instance, the use of coal in major industries releases noxious gases that reach the earth’s atmosphere thereby damaging the ozone layer. Scientists have been studying, that over time these substances released into the environment causes the thinning of the ozone layer. The ozone layer protects the earth from ultraviolet radiation from the sun, and once this is damaged it will cause increased heat and temperature affecting the health of humans and animals on the entire planet. If this won’t be intervened upon by proper authorities the effects would be tremendous and could possibly lead to irreversible damages.
Moreover, the reduction of fossil fuels can help in mitigating climate change. This is secondary from the fact that the use of this source of energy has consequences to nature. For example, the use of oil as a non-renewable source of energy releases waste into the environment affecting the climate in the long run. This scenario proves that if countries would have an agreement about the usage of sources of energy, they can create a massive positive effect on our planet. Thus it should be encouraged that international organizations raise awareness in all countries.
An international concern, especially environmental issues, needs a worldwide effort in order to have successful results. Planning should be initiated by the international community and other non-governmental organizations to coordinate all nations in working toward an end-goal, which is the reduction of fossil fuel use. These plans could include having international conventions to discuss researches on other sources of energy or providing financial assistance to implement programs regarding this concern.
All in all, it’s necessary that everyone should take part in the reduction of the use of fossil fuels because the effects are damaging the planet and putting all living things at risk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ies the effects would be tremendous and could possibly lead to irreversible damages. Moreo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... massive positive effect on our planet. Thus it should be encouraged that internatio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oncern, especially environmental issues, needs a worldwide effort in order to hav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34908136483 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96802235999 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54593175853 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7942237883 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160360474995 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522316352324 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497925513335 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104411061136 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491762620895 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.