International tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately,international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is indisputable that international tourism is one of the most leading businesses in our contemporary society. However, some individuals deem that tourism industry just make conflicts arise instead of gaining a crucial insight into different cultural backgrounds among people. Personally, I am not in favor of this view.
First of all, although cross-border tourism can exist friction between local people and foreigners, this can be resolved and sympathized with due to lack of reserch of foreigners and the short time they stay in the host country. With regard to the former, some international visitors come to the host country to travel, due to their lack of pre-departure reseach about that country's cultures and beliefs, they have incidentally cause some cross-cultural understandings. To illustrate, in some remote areas in Vietnam, international tourists are just allowed to capture photos in certain areas, but many visitors do not know about this and some even walk into the ethnic people's house to take photos of them, which has increased the tension among ethic people and visitors. On the second point, many foreign visitors just stay in the host country for temporary, which means many offence made by tourists would then be forgotten and would not be taken too seriously.
A more significant is that cross-border tourism can foster harmony between individuals from different cultural roots. Since first-hand experience with culture would render a holistic and unbiased view toward its people, which are often mislead by social media. To exemplify, upon making a visit to Vietnam, American tourists are astonished by the warm hospitality of the locals, who, to some individual's misconception, should be bearing a grudge over their war enemies in the past.
In conclusion, although conflicts as a result of inter-country tourism do exist, they can be successfully managed, and more often than not, international tourism is a contributing factor to an enhanced understanding of people from different cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames 61
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss on both sides and give your opinion 73
- If a product is good and meets customer needs then people will buy it and advertising is unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'caused'.
Suggestion: caused
...res and beliefs, they have incidentally cause some cross-cultural understandings. To ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 874, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun offence seems to be countable; consider using: 'many offences'.
Suggestion: many offences
...host country for temporary, which means many offence made by tourists would then be forgotte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...hospitality of the locals, who, to some individuals misconception, should be bearing a grud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, incidentally, second, so, then, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41324921136 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05074230803 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586750788644 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5784260401 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22832298904 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880869266573 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801483478021 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158653955159 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651064386313 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.