International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages.
There has been a topic of debate as to whether cross-border travel exerts more positive or negative influenes on visitors as well as the host country. Personally, despite some drawbacks, the values of international travel are more significant.
On the one hand, travelling internationally brings about several negative impacts. First, with regard to travellers, travel expenses in famous tourists destinations, Sydney for example, are very expensive. In addition, they have to follow a lot of complicated procedures, such as applying for a visa or booking ticket and accommodation. For the countries which play host to international tourists, the increase in costs of living might lay much pressure on local people. Because when the number of foreign visitors rises, the services costs, such as hotel rooms and other services, will also see an increase, which could be a detriment to the domestic travel. Besides, other people or countries in the neighborhood would also suffer in comparison.
On the other hand, the merits of cross-cultural journeys also vary. First, travelling abroad provides visitors with a large number of fascinating experiences of exotic cuisine and culture. When people go to another country, they will be exposed to different customs and see places which they have never seen before. For instance, travellers who pay a visit to Vietnam will have opportunities to use chopsticks, enjoy traditional meals and go sightseeing around the country. Therefore, they can gain more knowledge and practice some personal skills. Second, regarding the country visited, this helps to enhance tourism industry, which contributes directly to the wealth of the nation. Undoubtedly, tourism plays an important role in the development of a country. If tourists have pleasant experiences and enjoy their trips, it is possible that they will recommend the destinations to their friends and families, or come back in the future.
In conclusion, although international travel have caused some negative impacts on both visitors and the host countries, I do believe that its merits are more notable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | chetan kakollu | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | chetan kakollu | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | quynhdieu | 84 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities 78
- Everyone shouldstay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- The online shopping sales for retail sectors 73
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think it is a positive or negative development. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There has been a topic of debate as to whether cross-border travel exerts more positiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ravelling abroad provides visitors with a large number of fascinating experiences of exotic cuisi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45871559633 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0235757174 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4950582046 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168602297127 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542099116079 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505897016949 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119753880632 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350846744205 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.