It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Many people believe that it is impractical for a large proportion of youngsters to pursue tertiary education. While governments have aimed at expanding the number of university places for young people, I completely agree with the view that this practice is neither effective nor feasible.
It is not possible to provide university places for most youngsters. First, undoubtedly, governments have to allocate resources to abundant areas, such as military, health care and economy. In order to offer places to a large number of students in universities, governments have to provide more funding for maintaining quality facilities as well as employing qualified teachers. As a result, this might push governments to the verge of bankruptcy. Especially in underprivileged countries, where governments are also responsible for stabilising the economy and politics. Second, university entrance standards would be lowered so that students with lower grades could gain admittance. In term of transmission of knowledge, this will not only affect the quality of higher education negatively, but high-flyers will also suffer.
It is also not useful for a high proportion of youngsters to attend universities. Unlike vocational course, the curriculum in college covers a lot of ground, therefore, many students might find some syllabus unnecessary. Instead of pursuing tertiary education, young people should attend vocational courses or joining work force to gain valuable skills and acquire experience. It might be more practical for students to put what they have learned at school into practice.
In conclusion, I argue that governments should provide subsidies for upgrading facilities or hiring more certified teachers instead of offering more university places to a high percentage of young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nd economy. In order to offer places to a large number of students in universities, governments h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68518518519 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12972605593 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5356375137 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30874714629 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108016131278 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107511825058 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198023768731 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559995039724 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.