Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the digital evolution has enabled a growing number of people to access to the information about how others live in different country. While this view is justifiable to some extent, I am more convinced that travelling will bring a wider range of knowledge if we want to discover about a country.
On the one hand, it is justifiable to believe that visiting a country is no longer necessary to learn about a country’s culture and tradition. There are some people who visit foreign countries and leave without no appreciation of the spectacular landscapes or living conditions of local people. This is because some spots may be thronged with visitors during the height of the tourist attraction. Thus, the Internet may provide them a great volume of information about several aspects of other countries, which they cannot access during their holiday. For example, a migrator whose name Quynh Tran JP has made a variety of videos about her life in Japan. Her channel enables everyone to have a good grasp of Japanese food.
On the other hand, I believe that travelling abroad could bring several benefits. Not only can people acquire knowledge, but they are also able to meet new friends and build a relationship with others. Besides, some tourists favor visiting remote areas or going on a wildlife safari instead of staying in a luxury hotel, as they prefer real interaction and take away memories of the stunning scenery, sounds, taste and smell of the culture. For example, Nas Daily, who has a reputation for his videos talking about different countries in the world, has travelled to various countries for experiencing culture diversity.
In conclusion, while advances in technology help people to broaden their horizons, the personal experience cannot be replaced by material available online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- sports 56
- environment 11
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 61
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, talking about, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10702341137 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72417419475 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2070835744 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150836045526 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498384463523 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424047083871 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868708489009 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227843564274 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.