It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree

Learning about past incidents is significant for today's generation. It is often argued that films and videos are more convenient way to learn about the ancient people's lifestyle than written documents. In my perception individuals give more preference to videos for learning than written documents.

Undoubtedly, the appealing content is the predominant reason for using movies to gain historical knowledge. It is widely acknowledged that videos have graphic effects which make them more attractive. Moreover, researchers proved that videos are better than written materials, because with the don't of video graphics and sound effect people are able to remember all the knowledge for long period. What could be a better example than Mohenjo-Daro movie ? It is related to a location which puts a huge importance on our culture. However, before making this movie only few people know about this place and its importance, but now numerous people have some knowledge about it including children's who watched this film.

Furthermore, books are time consuming process, and it is a universal truth that in this ultra modern epoch individuals have very hectic life schedule. They do not have sufficient time for reading long articles apart from those who love reading. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that reading is a boring activity and in these days people need entertainment to get rid from their busy lifestyle. Additionally, videos are attractive and interesting to watch. It is not only a better platform for gaining information about our ancestors, but also it works as a stress buster. For example, according to a survey only 15% people like to read books for learning about ancient time, but others feel bored and sleepy. Regardless to say that it is also beneficial for children for boarding their horizon by making cartoon characters.

To conclude, it can be restarted that admittedly people have different view points about this topic. I my conception learning through video sources is a more beneficial than written documents.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...nvenient way to learn about the ancient peoples lifestyle than written documents. In my...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...han written materials, because with the dont of video graphics and sound effect peop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a location which puts a huge importance on our culture. However, before making t...
^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tractive and interesting to watch. It is not only a better platform for gaining i...
^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% people like to read books for learning about ancient time, but others feel bore...
^^
Line 5, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for children for boarding their horizon by making cartoon characters. To con...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31481481481 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82614337756 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595679012346 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1013640001 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224589573866 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750179549421 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764620149153 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159583226794 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707523385618 0.056905535591 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.