It costs a lot of money for a country to host an international sports event, such as the Olympic Games or football World Cup. Some people think that this is a waste of money, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the hosting of international sports events, such as Olympic Games or FIFA World Cup, is a waste of money or not. While some think it is not worth holding a big event like that compared to the economy of their countries, I would argue that it will bring more advantages in the long run.
On the one hand, there are two main drawbacks why some people think it is a waste of money. One common concern is the tendency for the autual costs of hosting these events to far exceed initial estimates. These expenses associated with constructing or refurbishing stadiums, infrastructure development, security measures, and organizational logistics can skyrocket, leading to financial burdens on the host country. For example, the 2016 Rio Olympics, initially projected to cost around $3 billion, ended up with a final price tag of over $13 billion due to various factors such as additional transportation investments, and last-minute venue adjustments. Another concern is environmental impact. The needs for extensive lighting, heating and cooling systems in the venues, as well as increased demand in the host city, resulted in a significant carbon footprint. Energy generation to meet the demands often relied on fossil fuel resources, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.
However, I believe that hosting international sports events will help to boost the host country's economy and tourism industry in the long-term period. The influx of tourtists will come and increase spending on accomodation, restaurants, shops, tranportation and entertainments, which generates substantial revenue. This provides an opportunity for the host country to enhance its image as a tourist destination, attracting tourism and encouraging future investments. Additionally, these events aslo bring people from different nations and cultures together, which foster cultural exchange, promote understanding, and create a sense of unity among nations. For instance, the 2020 Tokyo Olympics promoted its unique customs by intergrating cultural aspects into the event and the concept of "Omotenashi" emphasized to refer the Japanese art of hospitality.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to host international sports events due to their benefits it brings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 73
- Numerous animal species worldwide are currently facing extinction Some argue that countries and individuals should prioritize protecting these animals while others believe resources should be focused more on human issues Discuss both views and give your o 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 78
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle this issue 78
- It costs a lot of money for a country to host an international sports event such as the Olympic Games or football World Cup Some people think that this is a waste of money while others believe the opposite Discuss both these views and give your own opinio 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pics, initially projected to cost around billion, ended up with a final price tag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55710306407 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25651878716 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646239554318 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3044043052 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334702898635 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946368959853 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09078570004 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193079347988 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640895030936 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.