Numerous animal species worldwide are currently facing extinction. Some argue that countries and individuals should prioritize protecting these animals, while others believe resources should be focused more on human issues. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people argue that governments and individuals should take steps to protect wildlife, while others believe that resources should be invested in improvement of human condition. Both viewpoints are valid, but I prefer animal should be prioritized protection to focus money on human issues.
There are some convincing reasons why some opine that human condition should be prioritized. First and foremost, it is very essential to address human issues, such as poverty, healthcare, education, and social welfare. This can improve the overall well-being and quality of life for individuals and communities. For instance, if individuals, regardless of their wealth, gender or age, have the opportunity to go to school, communities can foster a more educated, skilled and productive workforce. Therefore, it can contribute to economic growth, innovation and social stability.
However, I would argue that investing resources in animal is extremely necessary. It is well known that some species have various impact on agriculture, about one third of global crops depend on pollinators. Take bees and butterflies as an example, these creatures can carry pollen from one plant to another, which helps plants easily pollinate and grow quickly. Moreover, all species play a pivotal role in the food chain. It is common that each species works together in ecosystems to maintain balance and support life. Thus loss of a speices can pose a serious threatens to the lives of others.
In conclusion, although both views are valid to some extent, I still opine that resources should be focused on animals because they are currently facing extinction.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 73
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Many people around the world use social media every day to keep in touch with other people and get news events Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Numerous animal species worldwide are currently facing extinction Some argue that countries and individuals should prioritize protecting these animals while others believe resources should be focused more on human issues Discuss both views and give your o 67
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s to maintain balance and support life. Thus loss of a speices can pose a serious th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...t life. Thus loss of a speices can pose a serious threatens to the lives of others. In c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87804483805 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6640625 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0117721636 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371370425828 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107921026876 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122957594644 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24174051202 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149145341006 0.056905535591 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.