It is important to be concerned about international events, even if those events have no impacts on our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people believe that we don’t need to be concerned about global events as long as they are unlikely to directly impact our lives. I strongly disagree with this statement because knowledge of international events allows nations to provide support to other countries and even come up with solutions to their own problems.
First of all, caring about international events allows us to help other citizens of the world. Humanitarian crises, natural disasters, and conflicts are, unfortunately, frequent occurrences in many places around the globe. By paying attention to these events. It is possible to share resources to assist others in times of need. For instance, the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan, China, caused a lot of damage. However, a quick reaction from the international community helped China rescue more victims than they would have otherwise been able to save if they were working alone. Also, many countries donated large amounts of money to make repairs throughout the region.
On top of that, well understanding of events over the world helps us to find out solutions to how to deal with problems in our society. Many countries have to face the same issues, therefore, looking at the success and failure of other nations guides us to decide for better solutions. Korea, for example, faced a dilemma when the number of migrant workers increased rapidly. Some of them suffered from poor treatment, while others remained in the country without a visa. After looking at international examples from countries like the UK and Germany, which have experienced a similar problem in the past, the Korean government was able to introduce laws to protect the rights of migrant workers while also reducing the number who overstayed illegally.
In conclusion, concerning international events happening in other nations helps us to support citizens, who are in need, and also provide useful information to resolve problems in our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and relevant examples 78
- In some places teenagers are encouraged to get part time jobs while they are still in school Do the advantages of teenagers working outweigh the disavantages 89
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations What solutions can you suggest to deal with this 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with solutions to their own problems. First of all, caring about international...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7735232046 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63141025641 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4633780855 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197287192062 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576796218133 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720185162835 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140070886203 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922815246934 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.