A controversy has been raised surrounding the issue of whether punishment should be applied as an essential means in educating children. I take the view against such an idea.
When it comes to right and wrong, it relates to the manner, behavior, and morals. And the punishment is an immoral way of guiding a young child. To coach their children on what is right and what is not, it is said that many parents have employed harsh punishments, including psychologically aggressive and physically violent. These are considered as violence against children. As well as improper ways of teaching the young how to behave. By means, using such severe punishments is not suitable in the case.
In reality, some sanctions affect children psychologically, causing adverse effects. The young was influenced by the penalties and started to bully their peer. As a result, punishments are not a successful solution for youngsters to distinguish right and wrong since it brings up more violence. These measures have a tremendous impact and can hardly be alleviated.
However, minor sanctions such as detention or grounded can be applied in certain situations where a youngster disobeys or rebels. While being grounded or getting detentions, parents and teachers can administer the rules and boost children to learn or do homework without playing video games. Cutting down money or phone is another non-extreme measure that could be applied. By virtue of such, a child can rectify the mistakes and avoid replicating them.
In sum, although punishments are inappropriate, to some certain extent, parents and teachers can consider using some approximate minor punishments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30418250951 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98684630495 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2117495928 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0588235294 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19729851305 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530739734677 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464703944751 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101649642171 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393450882497 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.