Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Pollution has become a global burning issue, and domestic waste is one of the contributing sources. Regarding such a problem, some believe that there is not sufficient household waste to be recycled, and they propose that a legal enforcement from the government should be required.
Firstly, it is important to realize that enforce a particular statute to solve the environmental issues is the best method up to present. If the legislation and punishment frameworks were applied, people would have to think attentively before trashing. For example, Singapore is famous for its hygienic rules. At there, civilians are asked to recycle the domestic waste by a decree with heavy fines. Unpredictable result comes out. More than 50% trash has been lessened each year. Clearly, the legislation has brought the positive outcome to a certain degree, which stimulate the process of recycle.
Secondly, education is a long-term solution for the problems. Increasing recycling should be brought into classes at the early age, so as to young generation can acquire necessary knowledge about the concerns. Also, TV reality show or campaigns can be broadcast through social media or traditional ones to enhance people awareness. Turning back to the case of Singapore, apparently, the government has done well their roles. Recycling has become a daily activity of the citizens and many tourists by voluntarily.
In contrast, the idea of implement regulations causing a controversy as this may create the averse effect. Some may feel resent and remain their ways of recycle. However, it is necessary to be realize that most individuals will take no actions unless they are forced to. Therefore, imposing a statute is mandate.
To sum up, for all the reasons listed above, I firmly believe that both education and law enforcement is require to advance households reduce garbage and reuse more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... brought into classes at the early age, so as to young generation can acquire necessary ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...t both education and law enforcement is require to advance households reduce garbage an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advancing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: advancing
...ducation and law enforcement is require to advance households reduce garbage and reuse mor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27333333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85875652844 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1623365486 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2631578947 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7894736842 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225245788605 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493876701331 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413614985525 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101416697996 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033138654029 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.