Many people argue that early children education should include the sanction which motivates children to distinguish clearly between good and bad things. In my opinion, I believe that this strict method should not be encouraged.
The obvious reason why punishment needs to be reduced in education activities is that it can cause adverse effects on children. Firstly, harsh penalties easily lead to mental pressure, even mental diseases which influence directly and deeply the development of communication skills as well as characteristic identity of children during their childhood. For instance, if a child is regularly insulted by their parents, he or she tends to behave violently and bully their classmates. On the other hand, some others can feel painful or become timider because they bear in mind that they have much guilty for many mistakes. Another reason to avoid using strict punishment to the youngsters is that the best way to educate them about right things such as love and sharing is love. In other words, when children probably are nurtured in an atmosphere which is full of love and tolerance, they will naturally learn how to behave and thin as a beneficial member of their family and a helpful citizen. According to a study of the Vietnamese group called "Regulations without tears", experts support this opinion by arguing that children likely imitate polite gestures of their parents, which they have received.
However, some petty types of sanctions are also worth taking into consideration to deal with naughty children or to use in some case of necessity. For example, when a child cries aloud many hours to command toys they want, their parents should ground him or her in the room alone to aim with helping them take time to calm down and rethink about their actions. Moreover, children should be forced to do housework to understand well the value of work and money as well as to learn the way to help others.
In conclusion, violent sanction might be not allowed in children education because of its negative impacts on the growing of children. However, I suggest that some acceptable sanction such as being grounded or working can help them well recognize the meaningful activities to become a useful citizen in the future.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option? What sort of punishment should parents and 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otivates children to distinguish clearly between good and bad things. In my opini...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09651474531 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6918118383 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584450402145 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4158831437 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.785714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178023481117 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601508461804 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328083154706 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109028319669 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340803175448 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.