It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think that the advantages of taking risks outweigh the advantages?
It is said that risk-taking is an important part of people’s lives, whether personally or professionally. I believe that experiencing a risk has equal advantages and disadvantages.
I believe that there are several advantages to people taking risks in their lives. Individuals who are risk-takers are more exposed to new and unforeseen opportunities that can help them pleasantly progress at different levels of their lives. Doing risky activities usually not only makes people more confident but also helps them to improve their skills and learn new things that they have never experienced in their lives. This condition gives people a chance to become goal-oriented individuals who tend to overcome failures and gain success and have a sense of pride and accomplishment. Additionally, risk-taker folk have enough ability to cope with different challenges that life throws at them.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, taking a risk may have some negative outcomes for people. The best example of this is running the risk of starting a business. Most of the time some people do not consider the risks of running a business, and they want to become rich quickly. So, they may do some activities wrong and lose their market share, which can cause them to go bankrupt. This is a kind of unpleasant experience that no one likes to face. Also, doing some adventurous activities, such as extreme sports which are usually done by individuals as entertainment, can lead to increased irreparable injuries, disabilities and even death. Therefore, individuals have to pay attention to the forthcoming consequences of their risks and make the right decision about whether they are worth doing or not.
In conclusion, in my view, taking risks has both benefits and drawbacks. People should try to take appropriate precautions when they want to do risky activities in different parts of their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | NgHgM | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | ojehparvaz | 82 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 74 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish They cause water and land pollution so they should be banned To what extent do you agree 73
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of old people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes Should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside 73
- Claim young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets have hurt their development of social skills Reasons these devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than f 66
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...aking risks in their lives. Individuals who are risk-takers are more exposed to new and...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24342105263 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02819592627 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8532051986 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350767907649 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131555369309 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101929003875 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246259341592 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387517817333 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.