The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is debatable whether the well-being of people in a country is the best factor for the measurement of the effectiveness of that country’s leaders or not. I believe that the effectiveness of a leader is not determined by one factor. There are other important factors, such as the education system, economic growth and human rights, that must be taken into account alongside the well-being of citizens.
It is understandable why the well-being of people is important when the measurement of the effectiveness of the leaders. This is because well-being is something related to the health and the mount of happiness in the life of people. Healthcare provision is a good indicator of the standard of living in a country. It can also be measured by consideration of the average life expectancy and availability of health services in a country. In this case, a leader is successful who can provide enough facilities for the health of citizens so that no one suffers from the shortage of medicine or lack of medical services.
However, well-being is one of the important factors for checking the performance of a leader. The economic growth of a country during the management of a leader is vital. Healthy economic usually results in job creation, high level of employment and better salaries for citizens. For example, during the president of Trump, American people had enough satisfaction from the economic situation of their country, and many residents in America were happy with the politics of Trump in job creation. But, this factor also was not enough for this subject in order Trump to be considered as a successful leader. This is because he ignored the factor of human rights. Racism was something that he believed in and he discriminated against different people based on their nationality, their bodies ‘color and their religion. In my view, a successful leader is someone who tries to considered all the factors mentioned with each other.
The best example of a good leader is Obama who attempted to improve the economy of his country and provide enough facilities for his people to live properly and had enough respect for all individuals with different nationalities in his country. He also gave all people equal opportunities, regardless of their colour or their colour or nationality.
In conclusion, in my view, the effectiveness of a leader should be measured by a combination of different factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by a combination of different factors.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0701754386 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04238561006 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448621553885 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.712376949 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.473684211 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198832023251 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758343907695 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751866725976 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139483911602 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704219440357 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.