It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and
their personal lives.
Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages?
As the paragraph describes the important of people taking risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Here the advantages of taking risks will outweigh the disadvantages in peculiar ways. Questioning the higher officials at the work place is an absolute risk and confessing people about how you truly feel about them has its demerits too.
Every person in a work place would be scared to question the seniors of their rude behavior because of their influence in that field. A individual cannot stand to an unnecessary insult done by anyone. To stop being insulted by anyone who is in higher position than him, the individual needs risk b questioning their boss. It could get that person fired from his job, however he/she would not be loosing their respect. In a recent survey conducted by "Times of India" it has stated that people insult the employees who work under them to relieve stress.
The confession of feelings to someone is definitely threat to their relation. A person who wants to express his feeling towards his subordinate is in fear of losing that bond between them. Expressing what you think would goes two ways either that relation grows or it may collapse, but if a person do take a chance to elaborate how they feel about the other person, it may lead to a beautiful bond. According to a recent survey conducted by "Swathi publishers" people tend to like the individuals who express their thoughts and feelings towards them.
In conclusion, taking risks is important for a persons growth, both in professional and personal life. By taking chance the individual could be at more advantage when they succeed, than disadvantage when they have failed.
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spend their weekly income in 1968 and 2018 summarize the information by selecting main features and make comparisions
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT PROFESSIONALS SUCH AS DOCTORS ENGINEERS SHOULD BE REQUIRE TO WORK IN THEIR COUNTRY WHERE THEY DID THEIR TRANIING OTHERS BELIVE THEY SHOULD BE FREE TO WORK IN ANOTHER COUNTRY IF THEY WISH DISCUSS BOTH THE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINIO 67
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 56
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT PROFESSIONALS SUCH AS DOCTORS ENGINEERS SHOULD BE REQUIRE TO WORK IN THEIR COUNTRY WHERE THEY DID THEIR TRANIING OTHERS BELIVE THEY SHOULD BE FREE TO WORK IN ANOTHER COUNTRY IF THEY WISH DISCUSS BOTH THE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINIO 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...cause of their influence in that field. A individual cannot stand to an unnecessa...
^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...n them. Expressing what you think would goes two ways either that relation grows or ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...lusion, taking risks is important for a persons growth, both in professional and person...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04561403509 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76631899383 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564912280702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1415160677 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413875848995 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141506933276 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137341466558 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263570432179 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140294328479 0.056905535591 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.