It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

History which is one of the common subjects was taught in each educational institution in the world. Some people think it is likely that local history is more substantial than global history to teach for children at school. In my opinion, I take issue with this statement for the following reasons.

Learning domestic history contributes to confident communication. This is able to make an impression on others people. There are many people who protected their own land were died by wars. Therefore, the children take pride in their origin, foster patriotism and treasure the life. In addition, the youth have a better understanding of historical events and figures. The young people have the ability to deepen and intensify their cultural apprehension.

Studying national history not only embraces a wide range of historical events but also comprises logical approach complications in the past. The adolescent are able to give a rationale for why did some civilizations develop sophisticated tools while others did not. Besides, they are competent to give an explanation of why some civilizations thrive, flourish and expand while others do not. The youngsters who learn global history are capable of integrating well. In the present circumstances, if someone desires to become a global citizen, they should know and care about the history and contemporary affairs of all humankind. Moreover, the world history plays an important role in comprehending how and why the world got to be the way it is.

In conclusion, local history and world history are different fields of history. From my perspective, both of those fields of historical study are significantly for the children in school.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-24 siva Pra 56 view
2019-06-01 Rohita 67 view
2018-04-11 To Vien 73 view
2018-04-11 To Vien 73 view
2018-04-10 To Vien 73 view
Essays by user To Vien :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99991769434 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0825099939 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274642044158 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764924489235 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823165883476 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169344985793 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827649590896 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.