It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no denying that teaching and learning history have played a crucial role in society. While some people believe that students should only study local history in school instead of world history due to its importance, I completely disagree with this idea.

As a result of globalization, knowledge of historical events taking place in a local area is insufficient and outdated for schoolchildren to adapt to modern life. With a deficiency of insight into world historical upheavals, young students are not able to comprehend the differences among migrant citizens. Thus, this creates difficulties for them to communicate with and build strong relationships with those people from different cultures or nations in their community. Furthermore, they are less likely to be prepared to live in another place as they feel unfamiliar with other historically traditional values. If those children are forced to immigrate and settle in cities, they will experience cultural shock more severely than their peers with an international historical background.

Another reason is that teaching world history can help young children gain various benefits. Firstly, children can gain a better understanding of their local events in relation to historical global changes. Secondly, a significantly wider background in local and global history will provide opportunities for them to process a multi-dimensional perception. For example, Vietnamese students can explain the independence day in 1945 based on not only national but also other world historic events. This also contributes to an extremely large improvement in independent and critical thinking in the young generation when it comes to discussion about a historical event.

In conclusion, I think that teaching children local history, which is considered more vital than world history, is inappropriate. Learning both will be more beneficial for the young.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-25 Mike-Huang 61 view
2023-08-17 hahaha 84 view
2023-07-26 pwlihnkt 89 view
2023-07-26 pwlihnkt 89 view
2023-07-26 pwlihnkt 84 view
Essays by user Lunar Tran :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62283737024 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14820710241 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5850032381 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240409461317 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833579747487 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561519575768 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160372501348 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058024104115 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.