Task 2: Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, the employment of technology advancement has been a topic of debate in many parts of the world. While some people argue that technology developments with an uncostly and accessible environment would create a breakthrough for both working outside factories and educating outside campus, I believe that steps of technology might bring a drawback in each one aspect.
On the one hand, the techno-appliment could not entirely take place through direct actions or face-to-face interactions of a human being in society. When it comes to work-from-home, it would be able to create difficulties to manage labour capacity. In addition, there are plenty of kinds of work which can not be replaced by machines and technology such as delivery, production, and so on. With respect to children’s studying, they could obviously meet hundreds of troubles when attending an online class, which apparently creates a passiveness of conveying and understanding knowledge. As a result of lacking techno-using skills, there is no doubt that effectiveness of work and education from home could not be ensured as equally as direct ones.
On the other hand, the employment of technology without face-to-face socialization in a community for a long time would lead to a social distance and increase mental health problems. By working and studying from home, many people would not only have mutual respect but also process social communication skills. According to experts, people staying alone at home must trend violence and mental disorders in higher levels than the ordinary ones. For example, there are divorces, even self-killers, when people must work or study from their home in lockdown periods by Covid-19 pandemic.
In conclusion, technology advancements in working and educating from home are instant methods and they are suitable for small groups of people, not for all. I have still supposed that they have existed in many negative aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The use of social media is replacing the face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- A government s role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure roads water supplies etc All other services education health social security should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community Discuss both these views a 77
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ation from home could not be ensured as equally as direct ones. On the other hand, the em...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03768426948 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9264815915 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234072698887 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849781906168 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057195565366 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141909261772 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292289804855 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.