It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an argument that spending the public fund on the prevention of illness by encouraging a healthy lifestyle is more essential rather than using it on the treatment of patients. Personally, I completely agree with this statement and I believe that maintaining a healthy lifestyle can have many long-term benefits.
First of all, I find it hard to disagree that health promotion and diseases prevention can produce greater perennial impacts on society. People who were persuaded of the advantage of eating nutritious meals that includes less meat, more vegetables, and free of fast food, therefore, can easily avoid ailments resulting from eating and plenty of health problems such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, regular exercise should be encouraged as part of a healthy lifestyle. This will help humans adopt such a healthy lifestyle and improve their immune systems. Furthermore, not only the physical health is enhancing but also prevents many mental health problems such as depression.
Secondly, it is clear that leading a healthy lifestyle that includes daily exercise and effective illness prevention will result in fewer people visiting hospitals, lowering the amount of money spent on hospitalization and other medical expenditures. In addition, if the promotion of this lifestyle and the prevention was convincing, in the long run, it probably less costly than paying for treatment. Obviously, this will contribute to reducing the government's burden of patient care and also the whole society.
In conclusion, I believe that the government expenditure should be focused on preventing sickness by raising public awareness of regular exercise and nutritious eating habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57088122605 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97569214886 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593869731801 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4151570957 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.181818182 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267997896278 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921809218308 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914182508713 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155256457438 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916064404327 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.