It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Humans have always been willing to travel distant places and learn what is beyond the grasp. With the advent of technology, researchers and individuals are now able to go to the far natural places by using contemporary vehicles such as planes, ships and cars to discover and investigate the indigenous habitat, such as animals and plants, and to explore their life cycle. The deficits of this development can involve being in a perilous situation and physical intrusiveness; however, positives are to establish awareness on appalling trends and mental health.
When people go to the remote places they have never been, it is possible for them to run across the dangerous occasions and interfere with animals’ life routine. As tourists exploring the areas of distant lands, they tend to walk inside of the wild nature where they can be attacked by predators or they interrupt the species’ activities. This would result terrible consequences such as death or being hurt. My friend went to the Africa two years ago and when his group was riding through the wilderness of savannas their vehicle broke down and two king lions had attacked them. Fortunately they were able to sneeze them by using a captive bolt and no one was harmed. Furthermore, my friend recounted me that when they were observing the giraffes feeding on tree’s leaves, they drove to close and giraffes run away.
As scientists visit to the remote distances they encounter a unique creatures and species which were never explored and they record an urgent threats to show it to the entire world. Moreover, some individuals use wandering through the nature as a relaxation method and to reduce the mental tiredness. Visiting Antarctica has allowed researchers to get to know polar penguins better and enabled documentary makers to film the consequences of climate changing. Watching this situation through the blue screen let most humans see result of the global warming and this would warn the all people to start taking actions against this threat. I streamed BBC Earth documentary called ‘Frozen World’ on Netflix a couple of weeks ago and observed an iceberg breaking off the glacier because of the climate changing and this really let me down. After watching that forty-minute episode, I decided to donate $100 to ‘Save World’ community which is fighting against the global warming. Additionally, when I was visiting the Amazon rainforest in Brazil last year, I had a chance to listen to the sound of nature and singing birds which boosted my energy and I felt extremely relaxed and enjoyed after coming home.
In conclusion, clearly possibility of visiting untouched wilderness has had many pros and cons on society, namely dangerous circumstances and interfering, and researching and raising awareness. With many perspectives considered, tourists and individuals should be significantly careful during the trip and scientists have to increase their researchers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | lalo | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | TrangDuong | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | pbson639 | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it This they argue leads to a more satisfying working life To what extent do you agree with this view What other things can people do to have a satisfying working life 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'threat'?
Suggestion: threat
...ever explored and they record an urgent threats to show it to the entire world. Moreove...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 474.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22151898734 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79584901359 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 176.041082164 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57805907173 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0896446298 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156035040885 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426623932016 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033446035309 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895407003115 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031972348694 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.