It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Thanks to technology advances in transportation, there are now numerous long-distance trips which enable travellers and scientists to visit distant habitats such as the South Pole. In my opinion, I think that this phenomenon has both drawbacks and benefits.
From an opstimistic perspective, travelling to far-flung landscapes can bring about valuable scientific and memorable experiences. Firstly, there are huge gaps of knowledge in terms of geography and history in remote areas. Therefore, if more experiments is conducted in these places, the science community might have unexpected discoveries which may benefit humans. For instance, by constantly researching the South Pole's surface, geologists hace found out several mineral deposits which could solve the worldwide shortage of natural resources. Moreover, given that the need for challenging and unusual journeys is increasing, trips to remote matural environment would offer learning and exploring opportunities for tourists. To exemplify, the conquest of mount Everest can give any traveller a sense of pride since mount Everest is the highest mount on Earth.
However, the increasing frequency of trips to remote places could pose threats to local natural habitats and wildlife. Given that these areas usually have their own unique but fragile habitats, any sudden flock of visitors can cause irreversible damages due to a lack of sustainable managements. For example, the regular visits of travellers have made mount Everest become a dirty tourist attraction with tons of litters. Beisdes, the destruction of the local habitat might harm species in these areas. For instance, there were many pandas living in Himalayas in the past. However, the arrival of humans, especially poachers, have put this creature under the threat of extinction.
In summary, although travelling to distant natural habitats might have several advantages to tourists and scientists, there are also potential harms to the environment and wildlife.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | lalo | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | TrangDuong | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | pbson639 | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- writng task 1 ielts academic table 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69463087248 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92719219111 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5292296915 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251520105312 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680302622723 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608312628207 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154070264743 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374496038397 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.