It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The incessant technological advancement of the 21st century has paved the way for human kind's expedition to faraway regions such as the South Pole. In my opinion, the drawbacks this trend yields are more significant than the benefits.
On the one hand, travelling to rural regions incontrovertibly bring some advantages. First and foremost, this particular activity helps scientists greatly in making new discoveries about the Earth. By going to rural areas, people are able to examine different types of environment, which broaden their horizon about the planet. For example, going to the South Pole enables scientists to learn about penguins and their habits. Second of all, exotic destinations are a tempting prospect for tourism as visitors can go to remote areas and gain new experience besides ubiquitous attractions.
On the other hand, the increase in popularity of this activity poses a multitude of concerns for humanity. First of all, the extreme weather of remote areas is a threat to people's physical well-being. As many struggle to cope with the harsh conditions of these destinations, health issues and fatalities are formidable. Moreover, visiting isolated regions does harm to the environment of these places due to the fact that humans interrupt the life of animals and creates serious pollution. To exemplify this argument, many wild animals in forests have gone to extinct due to the excessive hunting that people conduct.
In conclusion, advantageous as this trend is, its ramifications are more apparent. I believe that this form of travel should be strictly regulated by authorities for the sake of the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | lucluc | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | buiminhduc | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | anna103 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | Dave Skylark | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...1st century has paved the way for human kinds expedition to faraway regions such as t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun struggle seems to be countable; consider using: 'many struggles'.
Suggestion: many struggles
...reat to peoples physical well-being. As many struggle to cope with the harsh conditions of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32046332046 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93961630944 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0865016462 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209891347793 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629826777883 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462205624374 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119716400611 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027525464785 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.