It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The fast-paced growth of technology has given human race the ability to get access to some of the world’s most isolated area. From my perspective, considering the merits and demerits that this development offers, I would content that its positive aspects would overshadow its negative sides.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that easy accessibility to remote natural areas has lent scientists a great helping hand in uncovering plenty of mysterious animals, plants and events on Earth. To cite an example, by thorough investigation in the amount of ice in the North Pole, human beings are now not only fully aware of the emergency in the area but also in an effort of enforcing more policies and suitable measurements with the view to conserve the nature. Secondly, the tourism industry has reaped plenty of benefits from this development. There is an increasing amount of tourists purchasing traveling package to explore the wilderness since it is believed to help them escape from the traditional touring routes as well as broaden their horizons.
On the other hand, we can not be ignorant of the devastating effect that human beings can bring to the biodiversity of these isolated area. Given that the North Pole, jungles, rain forests and so on are among the most vulnerable places on Earth, the more people come to the sites, the faster their degradation level would be. There are still some existed illiterate tourists, who would destroy the surrounding biodiversity by dumping litters or threatening the wild animals. Should these actions are carried on in the long run and on a large scale, the world’s most precious natural resources would be on the verge of extinction in the near future.
In the nutshell, the possibility of traveling to remote places offers human both benefits and drawbacks and I hold the belief that its plenty merits can surpassed the negative aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- Some people think that organizing international sport events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 89
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 84
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...human race the ability to get access to some of the world’s most isolated area. From my per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, still, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07028753994 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74687188408 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578274760383 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8758655648 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.272727273 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4545454545 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113173823591 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380137532504 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296735921702 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664902799813 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351727486464 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.