It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Due to the development of technology, nowadays, scientists and visitors have been able to travel to distant parts of the world that were previously unreachable. Although I can acknowledge some benefits of this trend, I would argue that it’s an unwelcome development.
On the one hand, the merits of discovering new environments are undeniable. Firstly, tourists can enrich their life experience . Since going abroad for traveling has been too common, an once-in-a-life-time trip to a far-away place such as the South Pole can be more exciting to people and can also give them unique, unforgettable memories. Another advantage of going to remote areas is the chances for scientific research. New resources that can be found from those travels can help solve many current environmental problems, meaning that there will be improvements to all of humanity’s lives.
However, I believe that the drawbacks of traveling to remote places are far more significant. The first one is its threats to the local environment. There would be a higher possibility of pollution due to the gas emission, waste, and sewage releases from the tourists’ and scientists’ activities at those regions, thereby negatively affecting the environment and natural creatures. The second demerit is the dangers that visitors may face. The weather conditions might be quite extreme, and there would also be hostile species in virgin areas. This means that, if tourists didn’t have good preparation, those factors might have a detrimental effect on both their health and experience.
In conclusion, tours to distant natural areas might be wonderful life experiences to tourists and feasible chances for research to scientists. However, such benefits can be marginalized by its potential risks to the local environment and travelers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- In some countries people spend longer time at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 67
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative trend 89
- delete
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ourists can enrich their life experience . Since going abroad for traveling has be...
^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...road for traveling has been too common, an once-in-a-life-time trip to a far-away ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45195729537 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13067351285 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5879107495 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222414931873 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063903768382 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459926714861 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125024181549 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175371529659 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.