It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether it is much superior for schools to have accountability to instruct children to have good manners. Although some experts acknowledge that education systems ought to place emphasis on teaching students lessons, I would advocate that they need to be responsible for helping youngsters to have positive attitudes.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has prevailed some individuals on supporting for the former opinion. Firstly, when being provided formal education, pupils could have a chance to approach to in-depth knowledge. This can be perfectly exemplified that Le Hong Phong school has organised some mathematics courses for students excelling at and indulging in this field. Hence, they are capable of having a deeper insight to algebra and geometry. Furthermore, devoting more focus on conveying subjects to students can create an opportunity for them to realise their innate aptitudes. To illustrate, but for the attendance to some mathematics courses at primary school, Ngo Bao Chau could have not known that he has a talent relating to this discipline. Accordingly, he would not have proved Langland hypothesis and become the first Vietnamese to attain Prize award.
On the other hand, there a great number of justifications convincing me to concede that schools need to take onus to guide students to have ethical demeanour. The first reason is that civil education, whose lessons teach children how to conduct morally, is one of the compulsory subjects in education systems. As a result, schools have to organise courses relating to this field, which facilitates pupils to comprehend the knowledge and magnitude of moral values. Moreover, schools can be considered to be an ideal environment where children are educated about ethical standards since when studying there, they have to mingle with other individuals. This may not only enable pupils to foster their interpersonal skills but also help them have kindness, empathy and mutual understanding with other friends. Therefore, students are able to become sociable and build up good companionships with others.
In conclusion, apparently, it cannot be denied that education centers ought to have duty to give students with lessons and knowledge; Nevertheless, I want to assert that it is necessary for schools to be in charge to assist them in differentiating positive things from the negative ones.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-05 tieuquynh 89 view
2023-07-03 hien3112 61 view
2023-06-12 nguyendangquang.aspect 89 view
2023-05-17 Annie Nguyen 07_09 84 view
2023-05-08 grahamoneil 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether it is much superior for schools to have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rize award. On the other hand, there a great number of justifications convincin...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ositive things from the negative ones.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3746701847 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95704801154 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575197889182 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.91698165 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.3125 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117788606139 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406902620449 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362648830391 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080148853502 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365001831571 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.