It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As extracurricular activities have prevailed these days, teaching children how to take care of vegetables and animals is becoming more favorable. Although there can be no doubt that this trend is detrimental to a certain extent, the advantages bear a greater significance.
On the one hand, opponents of cultivation and animal keeping emphasize their negative influence on children’s physical health. As children get exposed to the soil and the fur of animals, they might be susceptible to various infectious diseases, which can lead to irreversible damage, especially brain damage. Secondly, as the majority of farming tools are dangerous and sharp, the children who cannot use them appropriately will injure themselves with them, and a scar will go along with them for the rest of their lives. Additionally, the children are devoting most of their time to studying. If they have responsibilities to look after vegetables or animals, they will be exhausted and overwhelmed, causing an imbalance between relaxing and working time.
On the other hand, despite the above-mentioned disadvantages, there have been a number of positive effects that justify encouraging children to learn to cultivate plants and keep animals. As children experience the farming process and acknowledge how much effort one needs to grow vegetables, they will become more engaged in eating vegetables, which the majority of juveniles hate to do. They will also advise their friends to consume more vegetables and help them improve their physical strength. Moreover, at this early stage, if the teachers instill the importance of protecting wild animals in them by taking care of domestic ones, they will be more sensitive to animal-related issues when they grow up. Hence, the world will see a potential improvement in the number of wild animals that are hunted illegally, hindering the extinction of several animals.
In conclusion, while the aforementioned practice may possess several disadvantages for children’s overall well-being, I am more inclined to the view that the benefits overshadow the drawbacks. It is recommended that schools incorporate at least two practical lessons related to cultivation and animal keeping into their curriculum to assist students in reaping the benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that international free car days are effective ways to reduce air pollution However the others argue that there are several ways that are more effective Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, at least, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50142450142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12483536632 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595441595442 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0586305002 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.928571429 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204373733961 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682775022949 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408319742961 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121766540288 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297317333581 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.