It is widely believed that national authority should raise the price of petrol to address environmental issues. I strongly disagree with this idea because there are various other effective solutions.
It is unreasonable to raise taxes on petrol in order to mitigate environmental problems. Firstly, fuel is a source of energy which is necessary for vehicles to transport materials. If the state made the cost of this energy exorbitant, the price of numerous goods would be likely to climb as a result of expensive transport expenditure. Secondly, the communities keep developing; therefore the demand for using vehicles to travel is indispensable. This raise in cost would trigger social disagreement and resentment, coupled with the reluctance of using fuel to commute every day, thus this could be counter-productive.
On the other hand, other measures would have greater effectiveness. The first solution is that the authority could implement certain regulations restricting the use of private vehicles such as cars and encourage people to use public transport. This would alleviate the problems of pollution caused by exhaust fumes and help to reduce the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, by increasing public education and raising citizens' awareness of the causes and impacts of gas emissions from vehicles, people will probably try to use renewable energy such as thermal energy or solar power in order to reach the goal of sustainable development.
In conclusion, I believe that heightening the price of fuel used for traveling to adopt traffic and pollution problems is somewhat absurd; and some methods should be taken to address this issue instead.
It is widely believed that national authority should raise the price of petrol to address environmental issues. I strongly disagree with this idea because there are various other effective solutions.
It is unreasonable to raise taxes on petrol in order to mitigate environmental problems. Firstly, fuel is a source of energy which is necessary for vehicles to transport materials. If the state made the cost of this energy exorbitant, the price of numerous goods would be likely to climb as a result of expensive transport expenditure. Secondly, the communities keep developing; therefore the demand for using vehicles to travel is indispensable. This raise in cost would trigger social disagreement and resentment, coupled with the reluctance of using fuel to commute every day, thus this could be counter-productive.
On the other hand, other measures would have greater effectiveness. The first solution is that the authority could implement certain regulations restricting the use of private vehicles such as cars and encourage people to use public transport. This would alleviate the problems of pollution caused by exhaust fumes and help to reduce the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, by increasing public education and raising citizens' awareness of the causes and impacts of gas emissions from vehicles, people will probably try to use renewable energy such as thermal energy or solar power in order to reach the goal of sustainable development.
In conclusion, I believe that heightening the price of fuel used for traveling to adopt traffic and pollution problems is somewhat absurd; and some methods should be taken to address this issue instead.
- Although it is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills I think that learning through watching TV is as effective as reading Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers When reading the 73
- The graph illustrates the amount of energy for the production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000 and predicts statistics for 2025 Overall it is evident that the figures for US consumption and US production increased over the period from 1950 to 2 67
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- There is a widespread saying that books and novels spur the imagination and language skills much more than any TV programme I believe that this notion holds true no matter what modern technologies are used on TV and TV media production The reasons are sim 84
- The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015 It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015 Meanwhile the cost remain 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...increasing public education and raising citizens awareness of the causes and impacts of ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43410852713 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07178306703 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6119682782 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384923620469 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148006665437 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167485817852 0.0667982634062 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286698478208 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264339407728 0.056905535591 465% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.