Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at the risk of dying out. I personally agree with the statement. I think that it is important to learn English but not at the cost of the deaths of many other local languages.
It is an undeniable fact that English is a global language and it becomes a must to learn the language if we wish to interact globally. English is one of the official languages of the United Nations with almost hundred countries speaking the language. This gives us an idea about how much we need to learn the language. But it becomes even more important to understand that it is not the national language.
As it can be seen from the education policies of India that all the courses are taught in English in an English medium school. And the people also have a narrow mentality that their wards should be taught in an English medium school if they wish them to stand somewhere globally. Due to both the policies of the government and the lack of awareness of people, many local languages are on the verge of extinction.
For example, the languages like Sanskrit are taught only for two or three years in a school. The subject of Sanskrit is also given less heed when it comes to evaluation of the student. Often the subject is taught less sincerely in the classes. The consequence of this is that we are seeing only a handful of students who are able to understand one of the oldest languages of the world. Not only Sanskrit, even Hindi is seeing tough times in its own country. Now many students find it very difficult to read, write and understand even the simplest of the words.
A language us the identity of the country and its countrymen. We should try to ensure the survival of local languages to save our identities. The importance of this can be understood by the fact that the names of every countrymen are in its local language and not in a foreign language. So if we cannot understand our local language we will not be able to understand the meaning of our own name.
To ensure the survival both the government policies and our outlook towards local languages need to change. We should encourage the next generation to learn and use local languages. The government policies should emphasis more on teaching local languages sincerely in primary, middle and higher classes. Also some courses can be taught in local languages rather than in English.
To conclude it can be said that English is a very important language to learn to interact globally. But it should be made clear that it is a desirable attribute to learn English language. The language should not be made mandatory specially at the cost of the risk of extinction of several local languages. The local languages should be promoted both by the government and the countrymen through some alterations in policies and outlook.
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages .If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion ,is it important for everyone to learn English?Should we try to ensure the survival of local la 56
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons f 78
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 96
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 79
- The natural sources such as oil, forests, and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...h is a global language and it becomes a must to learn the language if we wish to intera...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...uages of the United Nations with almost hundred countries speaking the language. This g...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat it is not the national language. As it can be seen from the education polic...
^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...language and not in a foreign language. So if we cannot understand our local language...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... in primary, middle and higher classes. Also some courses can be taught in local lan...
^^^^
Line 13, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me alterations in policies and outlook.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 511.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7084148728 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60378714413 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.385518590998 0.561755894193 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 748.8 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0607629446 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.9655172414 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6206896552 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55172413793 7.06120827912 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465826385279 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135978620063 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121231848966 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250665013697 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153267610351 0.056905535591 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.