A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods To what extent do you agree or disagree

Extending sentences is sometimes regarded as a beneficial way to punish those serious offenders. This approach has some advantages though, I am in full agreement that there are some other ways that are better to reform offenders and reduce crimes.

On the one hand, a longer prison term can prevent offenders from breaking laws to some extent. Some frequent offenders can be kept in jails so that they won’t threaten other citizens’ safety. They can also act as a method to enlarge the strike dynamics to deter those who might break the laws. However, extending the punishment can bring many problems too. For example, such a long penalty will cost more revenue to regulate the offenders and it is difficult for the offenders to integrate into society again after a long prison term.

On the other hand, there are some better ways to punish those who break the laws and reduce crimes. Some offenders are young people so giving them education is a possible way to make them aware of the severity of breaking laws. Furthermore, we can offer them vocational education so they can make a living after the prison term. Aim at reoffending, regulators could arrange supervisors to take behaviour control to make sure the offenders won’t return the environment that is liable to cause crime. Last but not the least, the most important way is to cut criminal sources such as drug abuse and family violence which are the inducements to crimes.

In conclusion, extending sentences have some benefits but there are many other ways that are worthy to take to punish the offenders and decrease the crimes.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93726937269 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53204836244 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535055350554 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1002698284 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24292613387 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981607285181 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885710302179 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147511902827 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382764680894 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.