Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
Scientists have been developing information technology nowadays, so some people think that it is a waste of money while governments keep opening traditional libraries. In my opinion, I agree that it is worth it when governments keep maintaining pulic libraries although the computer technology has been improved.
To begin with, the public libraries bring individuals who are traditional people and interested in reading books some advantages, such as focusing on study and work effectively and providing some excellent places to study or relax. For instance, the atmostphere in traditional libraries is an wonderful place to grouping study or escape the daily basis. Moreover, the environment, which is in public libraries, can help people effectively pay their attention on study and work. Therefore, plenty of humans might usually consume their time in being at public libraries.
Furthermore, despite the benefit of information technology, which is the infinity of storing space, it causes some negative impacts on people. Firstly, humans are easy to lose their attention due a variery of disturbing things, such as relaxing videos, interesting games, and especially exciting advertisements. For example, when they are working on the Internet, it will be some pop-up information, which will make people lose their attention and their excitement on their work. Moreover, spending plenty of time on sitting in front of the creen of the computer or laptop, eyes’ people will be impacted thanks to blue light that is from the creen.
To sum up, inspite of the development of computer technology, I believe that it cannot replace some functions of traditional libraries thanks to their beneficial things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 84
- Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...atmostphere in traditional libraries is an wonderful place to grouping study or es...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45660377358 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99484783646 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8159268199 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214257449894 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798672279262 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594538527748 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136455591349 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508444162705 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.