Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?"
Nowadays, technological breakthroughs allow people to do lots of things that seem impossible. We even can read books on computers or phones because they have plenty of functions of a library. I totally agree that investing in and preserving libraries is not necessary due to the fact that computer technology can be an alternative tool.
First of all, reading in computer science is handy and versatile. We can see that reading tools, not only provide diverse books like libraries but also permit readers to bookmark and take notes on the screens. Besides, technological devices decrease expenses when there are lots of websites or applications offering free books and materials. Furthermore, there are also offline books so that people can read at anytime, even without wifi connection, we just need to type the name and it may turn up. For example, Kindle is the most used reading application with more than 100 million users all over the world. Kindle looks like an online library, where readers can find tons of free books here, as well as order books with cheaper prices, compared to the ones in the market. Therefore, those development like this is an incentive for readers to read more.
Second, we don’t need to worry about returning books to the libraries while we can read as much as we wish on computer technology. For example, many people have to go to the libraries to send books back before the deadline although they haven’t done it yet, this may be inconvenient. However, when reading on phones or computers, we can make sure that the books are still there and we can open them at any time.
To conclude, with the developments of computer science, public libraries are becoming less effective, people tend to read books on phones or laptops instead because of the convenience and because they don’t have to return the books. The world needs poster the online reading culture to the youth more so that everyone can approach knowledge easily whenever they want.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional live and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Most successful inventions do not rely on complicated technology In fact some of the world s greatest inventions have been very simple things To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many women are in workforce today but only few are in senior positions What causes this phenomenon Suggest possible solutions that would resolve this issue 73
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'those developments'?
Suggestion: this development; those developments
...d to the ones in the market. Therefore, those development like this is an incentive for readers t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'needs'' or 'need's'?
Suggestion: needs'; need's
...n’t have to return the books. The world needs poster the online reading culture to th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94328358209 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62600732245 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555223880597 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3979130863 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148280887525 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588704934825 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482191826052 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115906786998 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710737191268 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.