Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?"

Nowadays, technological breakthroughs allow people to do lots of things seem impossible. We even can read books on the computers or phones because they have plenty of functions of a library. I totally agree that investing and preserving libraries is not necessary due to the fact that computer technology can be a alternative tool.
First of all, reading on computer science is handy and versatile. We can see that reading tools, not only provide diverse of books like libraries, but also permit readers to bookmark and take notes on the screens. Besides, technological devices decrease the expenses when there are lots of websites or applications offering free books and materials. Futhermore, there are also offline books so that people can read at anytime, even without wifi connection, we just need to type the name and it may turn up. For example, Kindle is the most used reading application with more than 100 million users all over the world. Kindle looks like a online library, where readers can find tons of free books here, as well as order books with cheaper prices, compared to the ones in the market. Therefore, those developments like this is a incentive for readership to read more.

Second, we don’t need to worry about returning books to the libraries while we can read as much as we wish on computer technology. For example, many people have to go to the library to send books back before deadline although they haven’t done it yet, this may be inconvenient. However, when reading on the phones or computers, we can make sure that the books are still there and we can open them at anytime.

To conclude, with the developments of computer science, public libraries are becoming less effective, people tend to read books on phones or laptops instead because of the convenience and they don’t have to return the books. The world needs poster the online reading culture to the youth more so that everyone can approach knowledge easily whenever they want.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-27 linh đan 67 view
2023-08-27 Afdalah Harris 73 view
2023-07-31 Nguyên-MTTN 73 view
2023-07-31 Nguyên-MTTN 73 view
2023-02-24 grahamoneil 61 view
Essays by user Nguyên-MTTN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he fact that computer technology can be a alternative tool. First of all, readin...
^
Line 2, column 635, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s all over the world. Kindle looks like a online library, where readers can find ...
^
Line 2, column 824, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...refore, those developments like this is a incentive for readership to read more. ...
^
Line 6, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'needs'' or 'need's'?
Suggestion: needs'; need's
...n’t have to return the books. The world needs poster the online reading culture to th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93413173653 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65644292564 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6082733215 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144873099694 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577207458954 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504154768262 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1150994145 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741770938226 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.