Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since digital technology is now replacing their function.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Digital technology has reached the point at which it threatens different spheres, public libraries in particular. This has led to the claim that their maintenance is not economically justifiable. I, however, believe they still have a lot to offer.
Some see no point in funding public libraries since not only does digital technology preform the same function but also ease the life. They say in both cases people access identical information, but time along with variety is in favor of the latter. Firstly, readers do not have to squander their valuable time on the way as well as in aisles seeking for the right book, because everything could be found with a click of a button. More importantly, some libraries may lack particular materials, while their online counterparts never let people down.
However, nobody should overlook the unique atmosphere of public libraries, which fosters us to study and gives an opportunity to meet a congenial person. Even a visit to a library evokes our desire to plunge into the world of knowledge. This could be substantiated with an inexplicable aura of the place. On top of that, one can find a congenial friend over there to discuss different topics, exchange valuable information and contribute to reciprocal progress. Therefore, people should not underestimate the role of public libraries.
In conclusion, even though digital technology has already replaced public libraries in some respect, they will still have a room to stay as long as they remain their inimitable atmosphere.
- When international media (including movies, fashion shows, advertisements and other TV programmes) convey the same messages to the global audience, people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity. What is 56
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticise their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples. 78
- Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticise their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples. 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieve they still have a lot to offer. Some see no point in funding public libr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne counterparts never let people down. However, nobody should overlook the uni...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cuss different topics, exchange valuable information and contribute to reciprocal...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estimate the role of public libraries. In conclusion, even though digital techn...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87775375403 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63967611336 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6196887579 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200993933279 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621014972303 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665979788888 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124643570569 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479062026168 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.