Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, the issue centering on technology has triggered a heated debate and it has been discussed by many people. In certain developing countries, computers are becoming a common way for people to access information.
Many people argue that with the introduction of computers, the authorities should not waste time on the maintenance of public libraries. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement because of some below reasons.
To begin with, the idea of maintaining the existence of libraries is beneficial. The library will always be the source of vast knowledge so that computers and the Internet could never replace them. The libraries are funded by the government in order to educate their citizens as these are considered calm and quiet places to learn. This is perfectly exemplified in the case of senior citizens who are much concerned about libraries and come to the library regularly in order to update their knowledge about their surroundings. Indeed, there have been some recorded instances of people who preferred to study in the libraries as they feel connected to themselves being in the concentrated environment. As a result, these few instances make it clear that the role of libraries even in the modern era of scientific inventions would be worthwhile in many ways.
The second reason why there are certain roles of traditional libraries that computers cannot take over. Library users have access to more reliable sources of information. A great deal of online content we have today, meanwhile, is not censored, which possibly leads to a misinformed public. For example, people who wrote any news and uploaded it for their own interest. After that, if readers inadvertently access such misinformation, it could be the cause of misbehavior. Therefore, public libraries are necessary and should be maintained by the government.
In conclusion, this essay argued that people who have favored the extinction of libraries have a flawed understanding because both have their own unique roles.
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems do this cause What are some possible solutions 78
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many cities an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and there is a lack of a sense of community What are the causes of this problem How can it be solved 80
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29012345679 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96438366146 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3404597719 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171794124545 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544360203735 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388028257343 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083355149671 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400009043356 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.