Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Preserving library resources and services is a waste of time and effort because nor technological media has taken over their purpose. I completely agree with the fact that public libraries should be maintained because they offer a wide range of benefits than virtual access. While libraries provide accessible services towards the public, it also acts as a department promoting well-being and health
The existence of public libraries can root towards free educational resources to everyone. Additionally, no matter their income, background, socioeconomic status, these societies make sure that their communities receive free, accessible as well as safe assets to everyone, free of charge. A clear example illustrates research done by a private institution showed that if the residents of the USA are put into a line, more than 6.6 million questions would be answered through the material that they have to acknowledge through visiting these premises. Knowledge about various topics and aspects could be learnt without any restrictions. These library services educate the public without any categorization of positions, which is a positive aspect.
Reading centres also advance in improving one's health and well-being. Library assistance, fitness areas, vaccination programs, health regimes are all capable of being evacuated through the library premises expanding the services that they provide to the public. For instance, a study done by the government and the library services showed that across the USA, the centres provided 59% to the patrons, 23% for the free fitness and 18% for the vaccination programs, where the rest was dedicated towards charity through the funds collected. Therefore, communities are kept healthy, increasing vitality. This positive feedback may result in the success and development of a country.
In conclusion, rather than digital technology which allows no social interactions and improvement in the well-being of the citizens, public library services provide activities ranging from education to the health and safety of the subjects which could lead to a success story of every person who gathers up to a whole community.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-05 hb 89 view
2022-05-05 hb 84 view
2022-05-05 hb 89 view
2021-08-02 Vinuki 89 view
2020-11-28 shozruxatashev 56 view
Essays by user Vinuki :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
... taken over their purpose. I completely agree with the fact that public libraries should be maintained b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...red through the material that they have acknowledge through visiting these premises. Knowle...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ading centers also advance in improving ones health and well-being. Library assistan...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62461538462 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9097119563 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612307692308 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0228456475 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.615384615 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144612488275 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492585078133 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487869780243 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937702384089 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562972950114 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.