Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary time, people claim that acquiring information on the Internet is more useful than that in the past, and public libraries are no longer necessary. While I agree that online sources of information have some advantages rather than traditional libraries, I would argue that there is still a great need for libraries in today's world.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that Internet-based platforms and devices empower users via the blink of an eye access to an abundance of information and data, serving them to retrieve desired information beyond the constraints of location. Another merit worth mentioning is satisfying the quest for knowledge of busy book readers, meaning that a variety of frequently updated e-books ready to be downloaded without spending hours in and out of libraries searching for relevant books. To sum up, there is a wider choice of books online for readers, as opposed to that of libraries goers, thus helping them to enrich their knowledge and understanding.
On the other hand, while this view is true in some extent, I am more convinced that government-funded libraries are greater necessity rather than a waste of money. One point is that the majority of printed books in traditional libraries would provide people with more authentic and reliable sources of data and information, serving scholars, students and scientific researchers who strict demands for data accuracy. What is more, a number of internet-based resources will be required to obtain an authorization to download, as a result they tend to scrounge in state-owned libraries. That is reason why public libraries and their sponsored book borrowing services are meaningful to readers from a disadvantaged background, ensuring equal access to valuable knowledge sources and promoting the habit of reading among the public.
In conclusion, despite the argument for government-funded libraries seem like a needless extravagance, I am of a belief that public libraries would make a stronger case because of their unique features and benefits.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. What extent agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that children should learn to compete, but other think that they should be taught to cooperate with others. What's your opinion? 84
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation on the Internet is more useful than that in the past, and public librar...
^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ocation. Another merit worth mentioning is satisfying the quest for knowledge of busy book re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34674922601 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12213407005 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9189653159 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.7 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136993152718 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558535110601 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386871318315 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08493526377 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375656334254 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.