Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The scope of wildlife preservation has been a topical issue in recent years. While some people maintain that it ought to be selective, others stress that the entirety of wild animals deserves such protection. This essay aims to shed light on both viewpoints before arriving at a final conclusion.
On one hand, diverting resources to certain animals can be justified by circumstantial factors. Forefront among which is the fact that some animals are endangered and without human interference, they will go extinct. Tigers and elephants are such species and need intensive conservation efforts, unlike rats and pigeons, which have skillfully adapted to widespread urbanization. Most would also agree that it is not sensible to give all animals the same kind of protection regardless of their specific circumstances. A more extreme critic may even suggest that some animals are more worthy of conservation endeavors because of their value. Tigers and elephants, to continue the previous example, are known for their majestic beauty. Other animals such as bees are also part of the conservation scheme not for their appearance but their usefulness to humanity.
On the other hand, protecting the totality of wildlife is advocated because humanity is often cited as the catalyst for the endangerment of multiple species. Prior to the industrialization and surging populations in recent centuries, humans and other animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. As human developments outpaced nature and decimated other species, it is the duty of mankind to safeguard other animals. Without such a forward-looking approach, there is likely to be a domino effect as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not endangered, it is vital to maintain its population levels so as not to trigger a cascade of irreversible ramifications.
Having examined both points of view, I concede that all wild animals deserve to be protected, although there should be occasional shift of focus to species that are on the verge of extinction. Ultimately, this helps to safeguard biodiversity from unduly succumbing to human progress.
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not endangered, it...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cascade of irreversible ramifications. Having examined both points of view, I c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om unduly succumbing to human progress.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38011695906 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0591894785 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599415204678 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5770341482 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190321291382 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526974839483 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534215721546 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108497929079 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121497388813 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.