Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Historically, keeping wildlife safe and protected has been a challenging issue. There is an ongoing debate nowadays about whether we should protect every animal or just a selected group. Both sides have logical points to make. To my way of thinking, every living creature is a valuable life that must be nourished. This essay will talk about the two opposing views and my opinion, as well.
On one hand, humans have been the main catalyst in endangering animals, therefore it is crucial that we fix the problem we have created. Animals are in danger because of violent and harmful human acts. Saving a few species and leaving others to perish is just another crime against nature. Moreover, saving all wildlife is not only ethical but also beneficial. Those in favor of this view believe every life serves a purpose on this planet and selecting some to keep can prove to be harmful in the future. For example, the chain of food might be disrupted if certain animals vanish from it.
On the other hand, it is readily apparent that there are not sufficient resources or many volunteers to act on this issue. Many suggest that with the little supplies available, a few chosen species can be rescued. Although this solution might sound immoral, it is practical. The wildlife selected in this procedure is usually the ones that are useful to the population. To illustrate, if both tigers and bees are on the verge of extinction, many believe bees must be saved. Tigers are usually admired for their beauty. Bees however are an important part for our diet. Honey, which is both delicious and beneficial, is better to be preserved.
Many lives are suffering on this planet because of the ignorance of mankind. I believe it is our duty to save as much as we can. Deciding what species are helpful and what are not is selfish and unreasonable. All lives deserve the chance to live, and if we have taken it from them, we must give it back.
In conclusion, there is no decisive answer on whether all animals should be saved or just a certain number. Although it is ethical to protect all, it is more practical to save some. I suppose we must tackle the issues at hand and rescue as many as we can. There is a long journey ahead, but with enough awareness and attention, we can make a difference.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get satisfaction in their career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the be 84
- Some people think that children should start school sooner while others believe they should not start it before the age of seven Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 75
- Society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 13.1623246493 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68564356436 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50167452007 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527227722772 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.310472683 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.1111111111 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.962962963 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 8.67935871743 242% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20121187289 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478096971822 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447263036608 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106562614471 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175083608589 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.