Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Since the dawn of industrial revolution, there has been rapid damage to nature, specially, the wildlife. With matters worsening, it is of great importance to protect the wildlife left on the planet. It is argued whether all wild animals should be protected or only some. To my way of thinking, each life is important and should be cherished and taken care of.

On one hand, many believe each wildlife deserves to be protected from the harm of men. In other words, they do not distinguish between the animals and argue that each life is valued. Every animal and plant plays a specific role in the chain of nature and disrupting this balance for longer will indeed have dire consequences. Preservation of every animal is not only ethical, but also beneficial to the nature.

On the other hand, some argue that only a selected group of wildlife should be protected. Due to shortage of resources and support, many think only a group of animals that are crucial to the system must be preserved. It may not seem very moral, however, it is of little logic to provide every species with the same amount of resources. To illustrate, tigers and bees are both animals on the verge of extinction. Tigers are most usually admired for their beauty while bees are crucial to the existence of other species, even humans.

In my point of view, humans have been the catalyst in the destruction of nature and many creatures. We have progressed in living better, easier lives and this should not be at the expense of endangering valuable lives. Each and every living being, should be nourished. Although there is a shortage of resources, we must work harder to alert more people in order to gather help.

In conclusion, Preservation of wildlife is a difficult task. Although many are in the favor of protecting only some, it is more moral to try as hard as one can to keep them all safe. There is a long and hard path in front of humankind, but with enough care and attention, there is nothing we can not do.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-26 Quân Lê 2020 89 view
2021-11-21 minhpn 73 view
2021-11-17 vidastiel 63 view
2021-11-16 vidastiel 56 view
2021-11-09 eyraen 71 view
Essays by user vidastiel :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68465909091 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55239358321 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2031786616 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.45 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236068883419 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644032760861 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740260253287 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121697199631 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637904961499 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.