In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, in various metropolis, the authorities tend to restrict supervision in the design and construction of dwelling houses. Manifold residents opine that they might opt for building habitations in their own taste. Others think that residences should be constructed according to general design. In my opinion, this idea possesses both pros and cons.
On the one hand, building domicile in different personal styles ostensibly bring about an enormous number of merits. The most conspicuous one is that people could apply their creativity and imagination in order to produce unique and impressive houses, such fact contributing to diversity of architectural residences and attracting tourists. Additionally, constructing habitation in own liking would help dwellers to actively manage finance for the purpose of designing and building house, the house appropriating with budget of individuals. Furthermore, well-to-do families could employ architects to design and decorate their own houses. That fact would create numerous job opportunities for architects team.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits, deficiency of control on the design and construction of dwelling house still engenders some considerable drawbacks. Firstly, the fact that building does not conform to general standard have negative impact on urbanism, this trend triggering a lack of urban beauty. Beside that, insufficiency of strict management in building house might cause hazard for surrounding people and landscape. The last demerit is that freedom in construction would lead to land encroachment, such situation leading loss of public order in cities.
In my conclusion, owing to the foregoing discussion the disadvantage of design and construction houses according to personal styles outshine its advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | Nguyễn Đinh Tiên Hoàng | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | nhathoa | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | Mr.Strange | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | phanduydat | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | dang_nguyen | 84 | view |
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reason for this and what can be done to solve this? 84
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time. 67
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 90
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below shows the top ten countries with the highest spending on travel in 2014 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 710, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... job opportunities for architects team. Notwithstanding the aforementioned benef...
^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersonal styles outshine its advantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94594594595 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21683030286 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4642170857 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310468063875 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090864802232 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531576899958 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172074622067 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325409139115 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.