In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta

Essay topics:

In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people argue that building a new house should follow the traditional style of the local area, whereas others suppose individuals should be free to construct their houses in the style they like. In my opinion, people should have the right to decide the design of their house.

On the one hand, it can be an eyesore if each house has its own style when it comes to architecture. First, houses in a small town or village would probably have historical significance. Moreover, their architectural styles likely reflect the local cultural heritage. Second, these same houses can attract a lot of tourists by their unique features, particularly if they are unique or unusual in some way. For example, in Finland, there are many picturesque villages floating on water, in which the houses have the same design and construction materials.

On the other hand, I would argue that people should welcome change in their area, and this does not necessarily mean the loss of traditional cultures. Individuals should be free to choose the internal or external design according to their own likes and needs, as long as they can feel comfortable in their own space. This does not contribute to the disappearance of traditional ways of life but helps the owner enjoy the particular character of the house. Moreover, modern construction materials, which are needed to build a new house, are more likely to be readily available than traditional materials, such as wood or natural stone. Finally, the maintenance costs would be more affordable than with traditional houses.

In conclusion, although it can be incompatible with surrounding housing in terms of general architecture, the style of a house should be decided by the owner.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-28 Nguyễn Đinh Tiên Hoàng 61 view
2019-07-24 nhathoa 78 view
2019-07-03 Mr.Strange 73 view
2019-06-01 phanduydat 84 view
2019-05-30 dang_nguyen 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10247349823 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84957302523 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544169611307 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9407074695 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338736018003 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117731561434 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770863611332 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221115940554 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748799483632 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.