The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrates, how many percentage of students who to choose to study one university in UK because of some exact qualities like, suitable degree courses, good quality of resources, teaching facility, other extra curricular activities, and near to their home town during the year of 1987 and 2007. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear that, more percentage of students went there because of the choice of course in both years with 35% and 37% respectively. The least percentage(10%) in 1987 was university which is close to the students home was. while, in 2007 this was rose to 22%. Similarly, only 6% of students who used to college because of good sports services in the year of 2007 as compared to 1987( it was 19%).
On the other hand, students approach to this university related to the quality of teaching was improved in 2007 from 15% to 18%, whereas, quality of resources was decreased from 21% to 17%. Likewise, quality of resources decreased to 17% from 21% as well in the year of 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | dm0218 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | trang130120022002 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | Drragkloha | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-24 | mary.ssherr | 83 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water use in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1987 and 2007
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 46
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The given pie chart illustrates, how many percentage of students who to choose to study one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hart illustrates, how many percentage of students who to choose to study one univ...
^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se to study one university in UK because of some exact qualities like, suitable d...
^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... near to their home town during the year of 1987 and 2007. Units are measured in ...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...hich is close to the students home was. while, in 2007 this was rose to 22%. Similar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hich is close to the students home was. while, in 2007 this was rose to 22%. Similar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 18%, whereas, quality of resources was decreased from 21% to 17%. Likewise, qu...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of resources was decreased from 21% to 17%. Likewise, quality of resources decr...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewise, quality of resources decreased to 17% from 21% as well in the year of 200...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., quality of resources decreased to 17% from 21% as well in the year of 2007.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79888268156 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66801745799 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.1578130462 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134550032562 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571478665203 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402709821324 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941236258868 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315797160705 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.